"NIMBYism" and community rights
Rep. Susan Emerson (R-Rindge) is sponsoring a 2016 constitutional amendment that would give towns and cities more power over the siting of energy projects.
The New Hampshire Community Rights Network (NHCRN) presented the amendment to Emerson. According to a press release on the organization's website, the amendment "would recognize the authority of communities to protect the health, safety and welfare of residents and their natural environments by prohibiting activities that would threaten those rights." The amendment would give towns and cities "the last word" on any energy projects within the municipality's borders.
Supporters of the amendment argue that the state and federal governments approving energy projects are too easily influenced by corporate interests, to the detriment of local residents.
In a recent letter to the editor, NHCRN Coordinator Michelle Sanborn notes that the Northern Pass Project, the Kinder Morgan Northeast Energy Direct pipeline, and several proposed wind farms all have significant local opposition. In each case, the state or federal government will make the final decision on siting.
On the other hand, a recent article in Forbes highlights how local opposition to energy projects may contribute to New England's high energy costs.
"From subways to bridges to power lines and pipelines, the nation’s land, water and key infrastructure is increasingly being held hostage by a growing thicket of regulation, sophisticated opposition and a me-first philosophy that regards development, no matter the public good, as a potential assault on the sacred," reads the article.
The constitutional amendment is also a significant departure from the legal doctrine of preemption, in which federal laws trump state laws, and state laws trump local laws.
The text of the amendment is not yet public.
Do you think New Hampshire needs a community rights amendment? Share your thoughts in the comment section below!
Comments
Login or register to post comments